“Strengthening the Household of God”: A Call for Regional Patriarchal Leadership in the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church
“Let all things be done decently and in order.” – 1 Corinthians 14:40
In the providence of God, the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church has grown from a small apostolic community in Kerala into a global Church, encompassing dioceses across India and the world. This expansion calls for a renewed vision and bold action in ecclesiastical leadership. It is both timely and urgent that the Church consider consecrating regional patriarchs or senior metropolitans, entrusted with oversight of major ecclesiastical territories, while remaining under the canonical authority of the Malankara Metropolitan and Catholicos.
This proposal is not about autonomy or fragmentation but about organic growth, strategic governance, and faithful pastoral care, rooted in Scripture, ecclesial tradition, and historical precedent.
BIBLICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR REGIONAL EPISCOPAL OVERSIGHT
The concept of regional ecclesiastical leadership is embedded in the early Church’s structure:
1. The Apostolic Model of Delegated Authority
“For this reason I left you in Crete, that you should set in order the things that are lacking, and appoint elders in every city as I commanded you.” – Titus 1:5
- Paul delegates authority to Titus to oversee the Church in Crete. Similarly, Timothy was responsible for Ephesus (1 Tim. 1:3).
- These were regional episcopal roles, subordinate to apostolic leadership but empowered for localized governance.
2. Jerusalem Council – Acts 15
- The apostles and elders gather in Jerusalem to resolve doctrinal issues affecting the wider Church.
- Unity in doctrine and diversity in administration were preserved.
- This serves as a model for the Church to create regional mechanisms for oversight without compromising unity.
3. Episcopal College in the Book of Revelation
“To the angel of the church in Ephesus… Smyrna… Pergamum… Thyatira…” – Revelation 2–3
- The seven Churches in Asia Minor each had their bishop, addressed by Christ.
- There was localized episcopal responsibility, yet each remained part of the one body of Christ.
HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS IN THE EARLY CHURCH
1. The Pentarchy and Patriarchal Sees
By the 5th century, the Church recognized five patriarchates: Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem. Each governed large ecclesiastical regions, but all were united in the one Orthodox faith and communion.
- This model demonstrates that regional patriarchates can coexist under conciliar unity.
2. Indian Context: The Evolution of Malankara Hierarchy
- The Malankara Church evolved from local leadership by Archdeacons to a Catholicate in 1912.
- In 1958, the Supreme Court of India recognized the Catholicos of the East as the canonical head of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church.
The Church now faces coordination, pastoral care, and administration challenges across vast geographical areas. The solution lies in elevating regional metropolises or patriarchs to more effectively steward local Churches.
MODERN ECCLESIASTICAL REALITY
1. The Need for Strategic Regional Leadership
In India and abroad, dioceses are now as large as small autocephalous Churches:
- Delhi Diocese: Nearly 80 parishes, a major theological seminary, and several institutions.
- Bombay & Madras Dioceses: Thousands of faithful across states with unique linguistic and cultural contexts.
- Calcutta Diocese: Extending Northeast, Nepal, Bhutan, and even the Andaman.
- American Dioceses: Over 100 parishes and a new generation of Orthodox faithful.
2. Challenges Without Regional Patriarchal Oversight
- Pastoral Gaps: One metropolitan cannot meaningfully shepherd tens of thousands across states or nations.
- Administrative Overload: Managing educational institutions, clergy transfers, conflicts, and legal issues all require localized senior leadership.
- Canonical Delay: While theologically sound, centralized decisions are administratively delayed or diluted.
- Youth Alienation: In the diaspora, lack of robust leadership leads to identity loss and fragmentation.
A CALL FOR COURAGEOUS AND CLARITY-FILLED LEADERSHIP
Biblical Warning Against Timidity
“God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power, love, and a sound mind.” – 2 Timothy 1:7
What is lacking is not theological legitimacy or canonical possibility, but the courage to act and the clarity of vision to shepherd the Church for the future.
- This proposal is not a rebellion but an obedient renewal.
- It is not a decentralization of doctrine but a strengthening of pastoral care.
Council-Based Elevation
Let the Holy Episcopal Synod, in prayer and conciliar unity, elect five Regional Patriarchs, tasked to:
- Serve under the spiritual headship of the Catholicos.
- Foster pastoral unity, theological education, monastic renewal, and youth engagement.
- Build regional seminaries, councils, and mission boards.
ECCLESIOLOGICAL CLARITY: NOT DIVISION, BUT MISSION
This model does not imitate foreign ecclesiologies or compromise the integrity of the Catholicate, but follows a well-established Orthodox principle:
“One Faith, One Hierarchy, Many Shepherds”
“The harvest truly is plentiful, but the laborers are few. Therefore, pray the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into His harvest.” – Matthew 9:37-38
Let us not allow fear of criticism or politicization to paralyze the Church. The Apostolic Church acted decisively when the need arose (Acts 6:1-6).
PRAYERFUL EXHORTATION
The Malankara Church has always been a Church of martyrs, missionaries, and courageous reformers—from St. Thomas to Mar Dionysius, from Pulikkottil Joseph Mar Dionysius to Vattasseril Thirumeni.
It is time for our generation to show the same courage and clarity.
Let us prayerfully move forward in synodality, spiritual discernment, and apostolic responsibility, to consecrate visionary leaders who will ensure our Church’s unity, growth, and spiritual vitality across India and the globe.
“Remember those who rule over you, who have spoken the word of God to you, whose faith you follow, considering the outcome of their conduct.” – Hebrews 13:7